Deepika padukone dating

03-Apr-2016 15:03

deepika padukone dating-66

Meet and fuck website in fiji

At the premiere Ranveer complimented Vin Diesal stating, “the mastery of your body is so impressive from a third person’s point of view because of the way you turn and the way you stand impacts more than the words and the lines.” Diesel stated it was due to his experience of being a bouncer in America.

We are interrupting our savage 62nd JIO Filmfare Awards live coverage to bring you something very ..... In our heads (and hearts), leggy vixen Deepika Padukone and enthu-cutlet Ranveer Singh are a pitch-perfect couple.

During an interview with film critic Anupama Chopra, Vin Diesel refers to Ranveer as Deepika’s boyfriend.

(ALSO READ: Protests against Ranveer Singh, Deepika Padukone and Shahid Kapoor’s Padmavati in Jaipur) Let me explain from the start.

Ever since Vin and Deepika got to know each other, thanks to their Hollywood movie x Xx: The Return of Xander Cage, they have grown really fond of each other. I mean when you’re on the set, you obviously interact with your team and especially your co-star because you tend to spend most of your time with them.

Deepika and Ranveer have been dating (from what it seems like) since ages now but after watching this video of hers with Vin, we are wondering if Ranveer and Deepika are still together.

deepika padukone dating-11

Free live video text chat with naked girls

This video has both of them thanking their fans for making x Xx: Return of Xander Cage a big success but it is their chemistry will will grab your attention more than what they are actually saying.Talking about which, Deepika Padukone had told a leading daily, ''From the time I came to Mumbai I was looking for a particular kind of home which didn't have to be bought according to the kind of of money I made in Mumbai.'' ''I've been used to a certain kind of lifestyle from long before I came to Mumbai. Thankfully my Dad has handled all my finances pretty wisely. She had added, ''Buying property in Mumbai is not that simple.